Skip to main content
Thailand Sustainable Packaging Management Act compliance for businesses

Thailand Sustainable Packaging Management Act: 2026 Business Guide

Thailand’s draft Sustainable Packaging Management Act will change how businesses handle packaging waste. The Pollution Control Department has drafted the law to make producers, importers, and brand owners financially and operationally accountable for the packaging they place on the market, under a principle known as extended producer responsibility (EPR). For international businesses selling consumer goods in Thailand, this is a strategic shift, not a distant policy debate. This guide explains what the Sustainable Packaging Management Act requires, who it captures, and how foreign investors should prepare before the regime becomes mandatory.

What the Sustainable Packaging Management Act Means

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a policy principle that assigns the cost of managing a product’s end-of-life to the business that produced or imported it. Instead of leaving used packaging to municipalities and the informal waste sector, EPR pushes that burden back up the supply chain. Producers must therefore design, collect, and recover their packaging across its full life cycle. The OECD’s guidance on extended producer responsibility underpins the model that Thailand and many of its trading partners now follow.

Thailand has adopted this principle as the backbone of its draft Sustainable Packaging Management Act. The law traces packaging from product design and distribution through consumer use and final disposal. As a result, extended producer responsibility in Thailand will touch procurement, product design, finance, and legal compliance at the same time.

Key Takeaway: EPR reassigns the cost of packaging waste from local government to the businesses that create it. Under the draft Act, that responsibility follows the whole life cycle of the packaging, so compliance planning must start well before disposal.

The Draft Sustainable Packaging Management Act at a Glance

The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment tasked Mae Fah Luang University with drafting the Act, and the Pollution Control Department released a draft for public consultation in March 2024. Officials expect the law to take effect in 2027. The current draft runs to four main parts and 53 sections, and it sets a clear direction rather than leaving the framework to guesswork.

Notably, the draft targets at least five categories of packaging that must be managed sustainably. The table below summarises the covered materials and the practical exposure for each.

Packaging materialWhy it matters for producers
PlasticHighest scrutiny; flexible and single-use plastics are hardest to collect and recycle
GlassHeavy and recyclable, but reverse logistics and deposit systems raise costs
MetalHigh recovery value, yet still subject to registration and reporting
PaperWidely recycled, though coated and composite paper complicates recovery
Composite materialsMulti-layer packaging is the most difficult to recycle and the most exposed to eco-fees
Key Takeaway: The draft Act covers plastic, glass, metal, paper, and composite packaging. Because composite and flexible plastics are hardest to recover, businesses that rely on them should expect the steepest compliance costs.

Who Bears the Obligations

The draft law reaches producers, importers, and brand owners who place packaged goods on the Thai market. First, these businesses must register with the Pollution Control Department, which acts as the main supervisory authority. Registration turns an informal sustainability commitment into a formal legal duty. It also sits alongside existing consumer-facing rules, so packaged-goods sellers should review their duties on GDA labeling in Thailand at the same time.

Once registered, an obligated business must meet several core responsibilities:

  • Collect and recover used packaging through reuse, repurposing, recycling, energy recovery, or safe disposal.
  • Operate or fund take-back mechanisms, such as buy-back systems or deposit-and-refund schemes announced by the Minister.
  • Communicate with consumers to promote sorting and the return of used packaging.
  • Report on volumes placed on the market and volumes recovered against annual targets.

The Producer Responsibility Organization (PRO)

The draft Act creates a central Producer Responsibility Organization to coordinate collection and recovery. Industry bodies such as the Federation of Thai Industries and the Thai Chamber of Commerce are expected to support it. Obligated businesses can join the PRO and delegate duties like packaging collection and reporting to it. In return, members pay management fees that fund the shared system. For a foreign company without local logistics, PRO membership will often be the most practical route to compliance.

Eco-Fees and Shortfall Penalties

The system is designed to bite. If a business or its PRO fails to meet the collection targets set out in the sustainable packaging plan, the responsible operator must pay additional fees for the shortfall. These eco-fees convert missed environmental targets into a direct financial liability. Consequently, packaging choices made today will shape recurring costs once the law takes effect.

Key Takeaway: Producers, importers, and brand owners must register with the Pollution Control Department and either build their own recovery system or join a PRO. Missing collection targets triggers shortfall eco-fees, so the regime rewards recyclable design and disciplined reporting.

The Trademark Trap in Reused and Refill Packaging

Sustainability and intellectual property can collide. Recycling, upcycling, and refill models often reuse packaging that still displays a registered trademark. That practice can expose a business to infringement claims, because Thailand’s Trademark Act does not expressly codify the first-sale doctrine, also known as exhaustion of rights.

Thai courts have nonetheless recognised the principle for genuine goods and parallel imports, as reflected in Supreme Court Judgment No. 2817/2543. Even so, refilling third-party packaging carries additional risk under specific statutory prohibitions. Brand owners therefore face two duties at once: meeting EPR recovery targets while protecting their marks from unauthorised reuse. A well-drafted supply and licensing framework can reconcile both goals, and secure trademark registration in Thailand remains the foundation for enforcing those rights.

Key Takeaway: Reused and refilled packaging that still carries a registered mark can trigger trademark infringement, because Thailand has not codified exhaustion of rights. Align your EPR strategy with your trademark protection before adopting refill or upcycling models.

From Voluntary to Mandatory: Where Thailand Stands Now

Thailand is not starting from zero. Industry has already piloted voluntary EPR through the PackBack project, led by TIPMSE under the Federation of Thai Industries, which began collecting used packaging in Chonburi province in 2021. By 2025, the broader “EPR in Action” initiative had mobilised more than 149 partner organisations around circular-economy principles.

These pilots give producers a preview of the mandatory system and a head start on data and logistics. However, once the Act is enacted, participation stops being optional. The government intends the mandatory regime to be in place by 2027, so the window to build systems, contracts, and budgets is closing.

How Foreign Investors Should Prepare

Early preparation protects both compliance and margin. International businesses that act now will avoid rushed decisions when the law takes effect. We recommend the following steps:

  • Map your packaging footprint. Audit every material you place on the Thai market by weight and recyclability.
  • Redesign for recovery. Shift away from composite and hard-to-recycle formats to reduce future eco-fees.
  • Decide on a PRO strategy. Assess whether to join the industry PRO or build an in-house recovery capability.
  • Reconcile IP and sustainability. Review refill and reuse plans against your trademark portfolio.
  • Model the cost. Build shortfall eco-fees and management fees into your Thai pricing and budget.
  • Assign ownership. Give a named team responsibility for registration, reporting, and PCD engagement.

These steps also complement broader market-entry compliance. Businesses selling through digital channels should read our guide to online seller compliance in Thailand to see how packaging duties fit the wider regulatory picture.

Key Takeaway: Treat the Sustainable Packaging Management Act as a board-level compliance and cost issue. Businesses that audit packaging, redesign for recyclability, and settle their PRO strategy early will manage the transition on their own terms.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is extended producer responsibility in Thailand?
It is a policy principle, now embedded in the draft Sustainable Packaging Management Act, that makes producers, importers, and brand owners responsible for collecting and recovering the packaging they place on the market. The obligation follows the full life cycle of the packaging, from design to disposal.
When will the Sustainable Packaging Management Act take effect?
The Pollution Control Department released the draft for public consultation in March 2024, and the government intends the mandatory EPR regime to be in place by 2027. Businesses should treat that date as the deadline for building compliant systems.
Which businesses are captured by the draft EPR law?
The draft Act applies to producers, importers, and brand owners of packaged goods across at least five materials: plastic, glass, metal, paper, and composite packaging. These operators must register with the Pollution Control Department and meet collection and recovery targets.
What happens if a business misses its collection targets?
If a responsible operator or its PRO fails to meet the targets in the sustainable packaging plan, it must pay additional eco-fees for the shortfall. These fees turn missed environmental targets into a recurring financial liability.
Can reusing branded packaging create legal risk in Thailand?
Yes. Because Thailand has not codified the first-sale doctrine, refilling or reusing packaging that still displays a third party’s registered trademark can lead to infringement claims. Brand owners should align EPR recovery plans with their trademark protection strategy.

Prepare for Thailand’s EPR Regime With Confidence

Lex Bangkok advises international businesses, brand owners, and investors on packaging compliance, environmental regulation, and intellectual property in Thailand. Our team can audit your exposure under the draft Sustainable Packaging Management Act and build a compliance roadmap that protects both your margins and your brand.

Schedule a Consultation